I being as a long-time FSX users switched to P3D recently, followings are my thoughts given to a friend who asked if it’s worth to “upgrade” from FSX to P3D.
Merely as a general pilot flight training aid, P3D doesn’t differ much from FSX in my experience.
Therefore, its $199.99 Professional (I’d rather call it a Basic) Licence price-tag is comparatively quite high. If someone wants to develop software for it, he/she has to pay an extra $9.95 to Lockheed Martin every month.
Even though its $59.95 Academic Licence seems to be more reasonable, users of this Licence should note that they are positioning themselves as undergraduate or K-12 or pilot students. I wonder how many users of this group are actually coming from the defined categories.
Moreover, Continue reading



could inject different pre-extracted sky and ocean textures from REX according to the calendar day of the month, prior to the loading of FSX or P3D. And these textures have been further mixed to maximize allowable texture-combo variations. In other words, my sky and ocean now look differently each day.

